A look into the musical world of Trevor Rabin: composer, performer, and a man of many careers.
Introduction:
Comments are disabled but please feel free to contact me at rabinesque.blog@gmail.com.
Monday, January 15, 2024
The Secret Discography: uncovering a classic
Tuesday, December 5, 2023
Media Watch: recent articles
A review of the 1976 album The Bull and the Lion (which featured instrumentation by Rabbitt):
https://www.ft.com/content/9dc0c20a-0051-4aac-bed0-47621a386eda
Trevor on the creation of "Owner of a Lonely Heart":
A listicle/interview regarding many of Trevor's best-known (and brand-new) songs:
Sunday, November 26, 2023
Media Watch: PROG issue 145
This month's cover story in PROG focuses on the 1983 release 90125, an anniversary-minded look back at the making of the album and its' enduring place in Yesstory, music history, and pop culture.
The band's groundbreaking 1983 album 90125 is 40 years old and Prog celebrates by bringing you the inside story of the album, via brand new interviews with those involved. It's a journey from an attempt to form XYZ with Jimmy Page to finding themselves topping the US singles charts - a first for a prog band!
Friday, October 6, 2023
Review roundup, part two
Happy Release Day to Rio! Here are the latest reviews of the album; I will be adding to this post as more are published.
The Album Review Channel:
Metal Planet Music:
https://metalplanetmusic.com/2023/10/album-review-trevor-rabin-rio/
PROG:
https://www.loudersound.com/reviews/trevor-rabin-rio
My Global Mind:
https://myglobalmind.com/2023/10/20/trevor-rabin-rio-review/
Everything is Noise:
https://everythingisnoise.net/reviews/trevor-rabin-rio/
Something Else!
https://somethingelsereviews.com/2023/11/16/trevor-rabin-rio/Yesshift:
Wednesday, September 27, 2023
Review roundup
A couple of full album reviews have been posted this week thus far...
The Prog Report:
https://progreport.com/trevor-rabin-rio-album-review/
Sea of Tranquility:
Saturday, September 9, 2023
Rio (preliminary) review
As I was given the opportunity to preview Rio - though without the context of liner notes and lyrics - I thought I would post my initial impressions with the aim of publishing a longer in-depth review upon official release.
My initial impression, much like some others who've had the chance to preview the album, is that this is not entirely Trevor the hook-master writing in previous idioms. I feel as if he has progressed into other realms which express the breadth of his stylistic impulses while at the same time embodying certain aspects which we might expect, but again going beyond in a playful and adventurous way. And I feel like the vocals are also confounding our expectations a bit, Trevor is still the melodic singer we know, but the current context of his artistic life allows for something new and interesting.
"Big Mistakes"
As numerous others have noted, this track has a great hook-y rock-pop sensibility and thus opens the album in a context we recognize as regards Trevor's overall identity. To me it feels like a familiar friend, from Lou Molino's stutter-step drum fill to that big riff and lots of dynamic Alembic bass. It is quite different from the rest of the album, but as I've noted that stylistic diversity is one of the hallmarks of Trevor's career then it's entirely fitting for him to pull a bit of playful bait-and-switch. And the cellphone gag is classic Trevor!
"Push"
This track has received a lot of positive feedback from those prog-loving fans of both YesWest and Trevor's solo career. Vinnie Colaiuta certainly comports himself well, as we would expect. There is a feel of metaphorical messaging rather than direct rhetoric as regards the lyrics, which Trevor has noted are about "the horror of politics and politicians." I would say of all the tracks, this one feels most like the spiritual successor to what we heard on Jacaranda.
"Oklahoma"
This track in particular seems to meld Trevor's scoring sensibilities with his instincts as a songwriter. There is an anthemic bent to the grandeur of the orchestra. I particularly enjoy the fretless bass and acoustic guitar textures. The way the song shifts from one movement to another has a "score suite" type of structure to it. This song is said to be about the Oklahoma City bombing of 1995 and does have an elegaic feel to it.
"Paradise"
This song features a fairly straight-ahead riff with lots of vocal harmony filigree, it has a similar vibe to "Big Mistakes" as regards how the hook hits in the chorus. If I were to guess, I'd say this is the other song which features Liz and Dante on vocals. To me the highlight is the vocalese-style multi-tracked section which comes towards the end of the track and then full-on transitions into a piano jazz section with a bit of brass. Very fun!
"Thandi"
There are sounds which introduce this track which remind me specifically of Ryan's debut on Can't Look Away and so I wonder if this is Miss Rio's debut (but pitch-shifted to be more texture than specifically a voice). This song mixes a rock structure with a ZA-style mbube chorus, which indicates to me that the target of Trevor's criticism is his homeland. There is a lot of guitar goodness on this track (in the classic sense)! And if I had to guess, I'd say Ryan is the drummer on this track.
"Goodbye"
This is the "chicken-pickin" style song which Trevor mentioned recently in media coverage. It's more traditional, to my mind, it's not pop-country but rather something more like Paul Simon's "Kodachrome" (which was meant to mimic the Muscle Shoals sound specifically). Towards the end it shifts into more of a rock-sounding motif. Trevor is definitely channeling Chet Atkins in his playing and I think there's banjo entwined in there as well.
"Tumbleweed"
As pointed out by Trevor in regards to overall vocal stylings, there is a lovely Manhattan Transfer-style acapella vocal to introduce this track which then gets a bit more playful and segues into a lovely guitar landscape with gentle vocals and a bit of organ. Because so many people seem to want to insert his former bandmates into this effort, this is the song I could imagine Jon Anderson contributing to. Not that I think it's necessary at all, but it's got that vibe. It's so lovely in the various sections and the overall mood, definitely a favorite from first listen.
"These Tears"
This also makes me think of Trevor's scoring work in terms of how the track is constructed: the layering of the voices and synth elements contrasting against the warmth of the guitar and the ethereal mood of the vocals. The doomed romance aspect of the lyrics is something we'd likely expect from Trevor, but set within this mood they take on an interesting gravitas. It's also a bit of a nod to "Promises" in terms of all that ambience, in my estimation.
"Egoli"
Of course a song with this title is also going to reference the township jive and mbube styles of Trevor's homeland. A tribute to the city which raised him, embodied by positive memories and associations and nostalgia. This comes across as Trevor attempting to come to terms with his overall ambivalence regarding South Africa.
"Toxic"
The intro to this one seems like a different take on "Market Street" but then immediately shifts into a upbeat blues mode. There's a lot of interesting texturing in the verses. Trevor's vocal is quite bright and melodic against the more gritty mood of the music. I do feel like the ride-out is a bit short, I think the track would have benefitted from a more dynamic full-stop.
Thursday, August 10, 2023
Rio is ready! (for review)
Advance reviews of Rio are starting to come online, and it looks like the first informal review is from Sean Tonar of Progressive Ears, who shared his impressions via the thread dedicated to discussion of the album/single on the PE forum.
Friday, January 1, 2021
Changes, disc ten: film music composed by Trevor Rabin promo
(With eternal thanks to Dearest Friend of the blog Cee for visual assistance with the physical media. And also many thanks to everyone who has helped spread the word about my coverage of Trevor. I truly appreciate everyone who has taken the time to read the blog and also provide engagement via links and other comments on social media.)
"Grace"
"Banger Sisters"
"Prague"
"A Beautiful Mind Trailer"
"Remembrance"
"Friendship"
"Sunrise"
"Gettysburg"
Monday, December 21, 2020
It's definitely Christmas...more or less.
As much as we all may be relieved that 2020 is finally coming to an end, it's perhaps a bit difficult to get into the seasonal spirit in our pandemic environs. So I thought I'd try to remedy that with some Christmas music, and a wish for all my readers everywhere to be safe and well this holiday season.
I've previously blogged regarding holiday music which Trevor has been associated with, and I wanted to take a closer look at Jon Anderson's 1985 holiday-themed album 3 Ships, which has Trevor guesting on guitar along with Elliot Easton of The Cars. And I will also note that I was inspired by the most recent episode of Yes Music Podcast, wherein Kevin and Mark discussed their impressions of the album as relevant to the season. But my primary curiosity beyond how it sounds and how well it has aged has to do with how much Trevor content there is.
There are two versions of the album: the original, and then a 2007 reissue by Voiceprint which includes five bonus tracks from other existing releases. It might be difficult to recognize the release as a Christmas album from the cover...but can we talk about how Jon looks like he's 14 on the (original) back cover? Give that art director a Grammy already!
The album is a mix of traditional songs and originals, both religious and secular. I would say based on the character of those bonus tracks included in the reissue that the original release was definitely aiming for more of a popular demographic rather than a traditional holiday vibe. Although some of the songs don't seem particularly Christmas-y, as there is more of a World music spin on a few such as "Forest of Fire" and "Day of Days," it's easy to apprehend the overall sentiment. This is Jon at Peak Twee, supported by a youthful choir on many of the tracks and lots of airy crystalline synths everywhere. It's a pop album, but Jon's voice is expansive enough to embrace pop in as supple a fashion as any other genre he has encountered.
Of the traditional songs, I would say my favorite is "O Holy Night" as it's been a favorite of mine since I first heard Nat "King" Cole perform it on The Christmas Song as a child, but it's particularly inspired here, featuring a lovely solo from gospel star Sandra Crouch. There are a couple of strong pop songs in "Easier Said Than Done" and "How It Hits You" but I'm more in favor of "Forest of Fire" with its' atmospheric jungle ambiance.
As for Trevor, I would say he definitely plays the solo on "Where Were You?" but that's it. And it's a cool solo, rather bombastic, suitable for the anthemic vibe of the song.
There may be other parts throughout the album but certainly nothing particularly recognizable. For example, I would be much more likely to credit the guitar on "Easier Said Than Done" to Elliot, as it sounds more like his style. This is despite what we see in the video for the song, which features footage from the sessions at Crystal Sound and so they are both spotted therein (and a funny thing to notice is Trevor getting his makeup touched-up at the two-minute mark, because he's barely in the video and we only see him from the side or the back). It's also nice to see Frankie Banali, but again, just briefly.
It's all '80s all the time, thanks to Roy Thomas Baker's sparkly production, but in a tasteful way. It's very polished, Jon is sounding great, very fun and upbeat and is a solid inclusion on any holiday playlist.
And since the album is an artifact of the 1980s, for those of us feeling not only nostalgic for the holidays but for that particular heyday, here's a (somewhat silly) MTV tie-in video for the title track. Jon's outfit is...wow. I'm trying to imagine what the legacy of 9012Live would have been if he'd worn something like that in Edmonton.
Friday, December 4, 2020
Changes, disc nine: Jack Frost score promo
(With eternal thanks to Dearest Friend of the blog Cee for visual assistance with the physical media. And also many thanks to everyone who has helped spread the word about my coverage of Trevor. I truly appreciate everyone who has taken the time to read the blog and also provide engagement via links and other comments on social media.)
Friday, October 30, 2020
Changes, discs 7 & 8: Live in L.A. and Boston
(With eternal thanks to Dearest Friend of the blog Cee for visual assistance with the physical media. And also many thanks to everyone who has helped spread the word about my coverage of Trevor. I truly appreciate everyone who has taken the time to read the blog and also provide engagement via links and other comments on social media.)
Note: I know I had promised this installment in the review series much earlier but it took me a long time to write this entry mostly because I was doing so much comparative listening. We're talking five different sources, which you might very well say is overkill. And you may be right about that, but for some reason I felt it was necessary in order to render a well-informed opinion.
https://rabinesque.blogspot.com/2014/10/some-traveling-music.html
https://rabinesque.blogspot.com/2016/07/a-guide-to-field-recordings-1989-tour.html
In my album review I provided the original setlist for the tour and I wanted to reprise it here as a starting point to discussing the recordings and for the sake of clarification.
Entrance: Lift Me Up (intro)
Cover Up
Sorrow (Your Heart)/Birdland (excerpt)
Heard You Cry Wolf
Changes
Etoile Noir (with Jim's bass solo)/Eyes of Love
Solly's Beard
Something To Hold On To
You Know Something I Don't Know* (with Mark's keyboard solo)/Promises
Sludge (featuring Lou's epic drum solo)
Encore:
Make It Easy/Owner of a Lonely Heart
Love Will Find A Way
*(Recently on an episode of Yes Music Podcast, the only two fans to actually witness Cinema performing [in 1982 at the John Henry rehearsal facility in London] referred to the former song as "Carry On" and that may well be the actual title. It's the title which became associated with the song as their recording of the rehearsal circulated in fandom during the intervening years. The reason I think it's titled as I've indicated has to do with the chorus, long-time fans know very well that Trevor normally places the song title in the chorus. To be fair, both phrases can be heard in the chorus. I believe I have seen a copyright filing with the title I use, but I can't conclusively verify that.)
Let's discuss the provenance of this recording. My apologies but I don't have the name/pseudonym of the original taper/seeder. If that person wishes to make themselves known to me or someone has that information and can impart it to me (via email) then I do wish to give proper credit.
It was originally a simulcast of the show on December 5th, 1989 from Boston's Paradise Theater on local FM station WBCN. Any and all versions of the Live in Boston recording stem from this single source. It was recorded onto cassette from the radio and then transferred to digital and speed-corrected using a Roland VS-1680 DAW then downloaded to CD-R and converted to FLAC for seeding/trading. At some point the Highland Project took this source and created the Cry Lonely Wolf version and released it on CD in 2008 (long after it had been put into circulation online) but that particular bootleg is not the original source of this recording even if it was used as the source, if that makes sense. And they're out of business now, so I consider that karma because...well...philosophically no one should be paying for bootlegs.
Of the three recordings from the '89 club tour which I have found it is absolutely the best quality because it was a radio simulcast. But despite whatever "remastering" (yes, I am using scare quotes in this case) has been utilized on the source and hence on this particular release, the source is actually at least a generation removed from what is available in trading circles. Plus, c'mon, Cry Lonely Wolf doesn't even have period-appropriate photos on the cover! Those are both Talk tour era photos. At least with Live in L.A. the effort was made to use images from 1989.
Of course, it could very well be that the source of this iteration is not the Highland Project release, and only the artwork is being referenced in the packaging. I don't actually know. But because I do believe a full show from the '89 tour should be widely-circulated and I have personally lobbied for such a thing for years, and this is the only way it's going to happen? My morals are just going to have to sit down and shut up. And Rob Ayling has already set a historical precedent for this kind of thing with Union Live.
The main goal I wanted to accomplish was comparative listening using my copy of the original seed versus the copy included in the boxset. But also, my primary point as regards the release itself - as a document of the '89 club tour - is this: Live in L.A. is the best listening experience in terms of the recording, mix-down and mastering, originally. You can really appreciate the performance of the songs, Trevor's peak as a guitar hero, and how the band as a whole worked quite well to entertain at an arena level within a club setting. The Live in Boston bootleg is the best listening experience of what the show was actually like from a historical standpoint, and that is something fans can definitely appreciate, whether they actually attended one of these gigs or not. I've encountered more fans over the years (myself included) who didn't see Trevor on the club tour than did and I think it's something we deserve to possess and enjoy. I remarked to Trevor during our latest exchange that because I was unable to travel to Tempe to see him (being a cash-strapped grad school student living in Albuquerque at the time) having a full show to listen to means a lot to me as a fan. I'm still regretful to this day but at least I can have a memory of what it was like. And so including both recordings in the Changes boxset is a nice completionist gesture, even as I'm not entirely certain it's really necessary.
In regards to having compared the two sources of the bootleg, there has been some "goosing" I would say, in terms of boosting the mid-range, making some elements cut through a bit more, like the vocals and the guitar lines. I'm not certain that was the best decision. But overall you can still tell this is a bootleg, which I believe just goes to show there's only so much you can do with such a source. There's a lot of hiss. But because we're hearing the actual document of Trevor playing to less than a thousand people there is a certain immediacy which might be missing from the official version of the experience.
I believe most of us can agree that the intro to "Lift Me Up" makes for great entrance music. And I think "Cover Up" makes for a great opener as well, it's quite dramatic. It serves to establish everyone's acumen from the very beginning. But there is a very serious recording glitch in the Boston recording which is not on my original copy as far I'm aware. Again, how could this have gotten past quality control?! I remain unconvinced there was any. And it features the first of more than a few instances of Trevor flubbing the lyrics.
Sorrow (Your Heart)/Birdland (excerpt)
I love that "Birdland" was used as the coda to this song, it's such a treat and it fits in terms of utilizing a different ending. I don't particularly mind the post-production edits on the official release.
Best version? Live in L.A.
Heard You Cry Wolf
I love this song, as long-time readers of the blog are aware. But at the Boston show, Trevor was having a really hard time with staying in key, yikes! And this was a song recorded after his range had already dropped, historically-speaking. Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if Trevor re-recorded his vocal for Live in L.A. And I don't take issue with that myself. At least he got the title right, because in San Diego he said it was "Cry Wolf." And because "Changes" was edited out on the Boston disc there's an abrupt cut which obliterates the ending, again, totally shoddy post-production work. Maybe because those songs directly segue one into another that wasn't the best choice in terms of making the edit.
Changes
I feel like this song was a benchmark on the tour - like, it was important to get it right every night. But again, it seems like Trevor might have rerecorded his vocal, or mixed it really dry in the recording. The version on Live in L.A. sounds better than other sources even as there's not much difference in the performances. What really makes me think this is the attack on the long note at the end of the first verse. We know if he can do that, then it's all okay. And none of the live versions I've heard are as good as the officially-released one in that respect. In Boston, Trevor can do it, but it's obvious that he's straining, and he can't hold it to let it fall off the way it's supposed to.
Best version? Live in L.A.
Etoile Noir/Eyes of Love
Solly's Beard
That intro? Priceless. As I've written an entire essay about this piece I feel like I don't need to expound upon it further, except to say that it's wonderful to hear an actual version from this tour. There's that one part though, which sort of almost becomes both "Memphis" and "Dueling Banjos" and how fun is that?!
Best version? Aaaaah, that's a trick question! But I think having an actual recording from the club tour is a good thing, so the point goes to Live in Boston.
Something To Hold On To
You Know Something I Don't Know/Promises
Sludge
Make It Easy/Owner of a Lonely Heart
On both the Live in L.A. and Boston versions the crowd does the majority of the singing so it's interesting to listen to recordings where Trevor is actually singing. "Owner" in its' final form is not in his range, as we know, so that always makes me tense. In San Diego it's not so bad, but it's not that good either. But I am disappointed Trevor edited out that funky breakdown which comes right before the last chorus. I think the party atmosphere of audience participation makes the song more fun, as is fitting for an encore. The L.A. crowd sounds better at singing, but that might also be the result of post-production tweaking.
Best version? Whichever one you prefer.
Best version? Whichever one you prefer.
Monday, September 14, 2020
A Guide to Field Recordings: 9012Live
The timing of this entry is primarily prompted by a fandom works crossover so crazy it might actually work! Recently I joined fellow Yesfan and dear friend Jennifer Albright, co-creator/co-host of the Have You SEEN This? podcast, for a discussion of 9012Live - that cinematic classic and YesWest cultural document of everything which is both glorious and hilarious but also endearingly kitschy about the 1980s. My eternal love and thanks to Jen for entertaining my idea, being so gracious to allow me to come on her show, and for all the hours we've spent geeking out over prog rock through the years.
Official links for Have You SEEN This?
http://www.haveyouseen.us/
https://soundcloud.com/have-you-seen-this
The full version of the episode is about two-and-a-half hours and was kindly provided to me by Jen as an exclusive to Rabin-esque. You can listen/download via this link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1L3IIXocRSyN6agiSDJfok-67jD9DBPcV
Content warning: contains profanity, snark, general affectionate irreverence and lampoonery courtesy of two fangirls who are also legitimately discerning adults.
Caveat audiens.
But as I already had a write-up of the film and the album in the works, I decided I would combine the two, so here now is my commentary on these releases, provided as an accompaniment to my remarks in the podcast and in observance of 9012Live's (in both forms) 35th anniversary this year.
9012Live and 9012Live: The Solos were released simultaneously in November 1985, the album was created as a companion to the film. The DVD release of the film came in 2006, featuring bonus content and a Director’s Cut without the Charlex effects, then an expanded version of the album was released in 2011 featuring two extra songs. But we still don’t have an officially-released pro-shot/recorded version of an entire 9012Live show...and we probably never will.
Although Charlex's involvement in the world of music videos would be relatively short-lived (though the company is still in operation to this day), their participation in the production of 9012Live was considered rather groundbreaking at the time. In May of 1985, Billboard covered Charlex’s work on the film for the Video Music section of the publication - Charlex was brought on board the project to “modernize” and “enhance” the film, to bring it more in line with the way music videos were being created at the time. This was the first time the special effects production company had been asked to work on a longer-form project, on the heels of their award-winning contributions to The Cars’ video for “You Might Think.” Lookout Management liked what they had done with The Cars' Heartbeat City videos collection from 1984 and asked them to do something similar for 9012Live. But while Charlex created only transitional pieces for The Cars' video album, they did much more for 9012Live, even beyond what was originally negotiated for their contract. They envisioned each song as a type of music video on its own while also including transitional pieces between songs as well as a framing device to begin and end the film (as long-time fans are aware, the ending is where the title for the next album came from), and used the palette of the album design and stage production as their guide for those elements which appear in color. Since all of the Charlex footage came from the 1950s (educational and industrial training films, for example), I find it amusing that it’s considered a modernization, but I know that’s strictly meant in terms of the use of post-production SFX. There’s all kinds of effects used for the “living electronic collage” they created as the framing device.
"Young Man's Fancy" created for the Edison Electric Institute in 1952.
By the time Charlex received the film it had been edited down to nine songs. They were asked to leave “Owner of a Lonely Heart” alone - hence the sort of gimmicky (but not in a bad way, in my estimation) editing you see in that song instead, although I love that “smash cut on speed” utilized at the beginning, sequenced to that one famous sample. I wonder if maybe they considered releasing another single and video for “Owner” around that time consisting of that part of the film (hence why it has more obvious edits), but their choice was “Hold On.”
While I certainly prefer watching the film without the Charlex effects, I can appreciate the effort which went into them, both thematically and technically. As a piece of conceptual video I think it works some times ("Changes" and "City of Love") and not others ("Hold On" - which really just needs to be viewed in all its' actual bromantic glory). Historically I can understand why the braintrust thought it was a good idea to contemporize the band's efforts overall. Love it or hate it, YesWest has a distinct visual identity in the continuum and that's a big reason why I love it.
Filmed in Edmonton, Canada in September 1984 near the end of the North American 9012Live tour, the film is a mix of live footage and pick-up shots which were filmed during the day of the second show - it was a two-night stand, and they filmed both nights. I think it’s edited quite well but you can tell the difference, especially when it comes to “Starship Trooper” where everyone looks rather more sweaty in certain shots but not in others. Apparently the film was also meant to include the encore “Roundabout” but it was cut, perhaps because there’s a continuity error - Trevor isn’t wearing the same pants in all shots. In some it’s the black satin pants with the yellow striping, in others black leather pants. I think the leather pants may have been from when they were filming the pick-up shots. That portion is included as bonus content on the DVD release.
Watching the Director’s Cut versus the original version gives you an appreciation for the way Soderbergh decided to film the show, there’s an immediacy achieved without having to necessarily resort to the kind of editing and post-production which was typically utilized at the time by directors like Russell Mulcahy, Wayne Isham and Marty Callner. It seems a far more “natural” experience of a concert, if you could see a show up-close in that way. Compared to the way Yessongs was produced in 1972, for example. Yessongs is very dark and it’s primarily close-ups shot from the photographer’s pit mixed with long shots from the balcony and then also shots from the side of the stage. In 9012Live there are intentional editing cuts to the music at some points, and the use of varying types of composition to emphasize that this is a band onstage. The staging itself dictates a sort of artificiality of perspective and use of the space. Originally Yes was going to have Berlin as their opening act for the 9012Live tour but the raked stage set meant there was no room for another band to set up, thus fans got to watch cartoons while waiting for showtime and this set a precedent over the course of their particular career trajectory. But overall the editing is wholly engaging and dynamic and adds great value in terms of repeat viewing. Soderbergh stated in an interview from 2012 that at the time he was working on the film he believed he was turning into a formalist - he liked to polish things - but I don't view it as a drawback in this case.
The best thing about 9012Live, in my estimation, is that it is shot on film rather than video. It makes everybody look so gorgeous. And despite being an artifact of its' time that particular medium provides it with a certain timeless aura when viewed in the present day. It's amusing to me that many fans deride the '80sness of the film, especially in terms of hair and wardrobe but the truth is Yes has always been a band of its' time in that respect. They've always worn rather fancy stage outfits and sported haircuts which were trendy (Chris especially). So it's rather less hypocritical to opine that their '80s look was not to one's taste but the '70s were fine because reasons. It's certainly laughable now on some level, but really I think it's wonderful to have a document of a time when they were young and popular and excessively glorious. Because that's never happening again. I find it's something more than mere nostalgia to experience. To watch 9012Live provides something beyond memories of my own youth, it's joy in a particular triumph and that translates to their performances. If I'm depressed, 9012Live never fails to give me happiness. So in these trying times it's become entirely necessary in maintaining my overall mental health.
That's right: 9012Live is my self-care. There, I said it.
But it's not as if the performative aspect is underplayed in this film, there's editing choices which emphasize the personalities and staging very distinctly - such as "Leave It" which as we know now was pretty much entirely lip-synched (save for Trevor and Jon's lead verses and end refrains) and set to the single version of the song, augmented with a few instrumental flourishes. Certain parts of the performance are choreographed, and probably even more so for the sake of the film. As well, certain aspects of the production had changed by the second North American tour, as the laser effects were omitted but they continued to utilize the fairly large Vari-Lite rig. But it makes for an entertaining experience, even if it's one which makes you laugh (and possibly even sympathetically cringe). Again, Chris Squire was known for more than a few things, and his outsize personality and flamboyance onstage were legendary. The uniqueness of the situation is part and parcel of the film itself, meant to celebrate YesWest as much as market them to any portion of the public not already in their thrall. The Arena Rock performative aspect is entirely necessary in terms of entertainment value. It's also interesting to have a document which primarily focuses on their contemporary identity, as when the band performed they had to continue to acknowledge the past, culminating with the Eighty Dates tour in support of the Union release and a setlist which was more Classic Yes in its' makeup than what they were ostensibly supposed to be promoting. Fans were then somewhat shocked to witness the band playing nearly the entirety of Talk in 1994, as they had grown so used to the preponderance of Classic Yes songs in a typical YesWest setlist.
But this is what touring used to be about in the Long Long Ago - playing the new songs. And by taking on the mantle of Yes - and thus the collective history of the continuum - even an updated version of the band could never wholly focus on cultivating their own identity.
And so even the live album - if you can call it that - was again focusing on contemporary Yes, with the "solo" setpieces within the '84 setlist as well as two songs from 90125. It really comes off as more of a novelty than anything, although I think it's enjoyable as a live document even as it also subverts the established expectations of fans.
The additional songs included on the 2011 reissue had both been previously released:
"It Can Happen" - as the b-side of "It Can Happen" (Atlanta 4/16/84)
"City of Love" - as the b-side of "Rhythm of Love" (from 9012Live - Edmonton '84)
...and they're nice to have, certainly, but I think it would have been possible and also desirable to include something from that tour which technically had never been released before, such as a recording of "Hearts." We know there is audio of complete shows in the archives, even though it's very likely it will simply remain there. I also think it's entirely reasonable to state that "Cinema" should have been included as the first track as it represents a collective solo setpiece of sorts and makes for a nice overture (as both YesWest and ARW amply demonstrated in their shows). But I certainly recommend getting the reissue for anyone who's a completist or perhaps has never owned a copy of this release previously. It's unfortunate that only the original release has been licensed for streaming. Of those full songs included, I do think the two which are most indicative of the YesWest live experience are "Hold On" and "City of Love" which sound so amazingly alive and masterful in their renditions. And I will say as someone who has never been that big of a fan of "It Can Happen" - the Atlanta version, while heavily augmented by sampling and backing tapes, is also really engaging. Repeated listening has caused me to realize that the figure Trevor plays behind the verses sounds a lot like the riffing in "Run Like Hell."
One consideration is if YesWest had released a traditional live album then the solo spots would have likely been omitted in favor of songs and so I suppose given a choice of one or the other it's understandable that someone (like the band) would have wanted documentation of this aspect of the live experience. It could even be that because we don't see this aspect in the film it also prompted the decision to make the solos the focus of the album.
Given what has been included overall via officially-released sources, here is how 9012Live: The Solos should be sequenced (in my opinion).
Hold On
Si/Solly's Beard
Changes
Soon
It Can Happen
Amazing Grace/Whitefish
City of Love
More than a few fans have also posited that they believe the version of "Solly's Beard" included on the remastered version of Trevor's Live in L.A. album was sourced from 9012Live: The Solos and I will say I also believe that's likely correct. I've done some comparative listening and it's definitely from 1984 as well as nearly identical in length. It certainly would have been the easiest source to obtain. It makes sense from a logistical standpoint but not a contextual one, which I elaborated upon in my "Trevor vs. Trevor" essay from 2016. But it is one of the best versions and also best-recorded, so I get it, even as it makes the research geek in me twitch because it's not a historically-accurate inclusion. Speaking of sources, the solo spots themselves are from their June 24th show in Dortmund (which was also filmed and televised in part) and the full songs from the 9012Live recording.
But also speaking of expansions...let's talk about the DVD extras because 9012Live is an example of a reissue which is entirely desirable with new (to us) and exciting bonus material (unlike pretty much everything else having to do with YesWest archival releases at least in the past decade or so). This is the visual release (besides YesYears) which is absolutely required for YesWest fans to own.
Access All Areas
This is a behind-the-scenes look at the '84 tour, but it's also almost an inversion of the expected format. I would call it perhaps an "observational documentary," a short film with a particular editorial perspective, one which is rather more frank about the backstage experience (but not in an overtly salacious kind of way). It's largely humorous but at times that's because all Steven has to do is point the camera and whomever is in the lens is "on." But I completely understand why it wasn't released in 1985, it's simply too honest about the business of touring and the business of YesWest - if in fact it was meant to be released at all; it's possible Soderbergh shot it for the organization's amusement, or his own for that matter. The ridiculous and the cunning are presented with equal focus and directness. I suppose you could say that it does dilute the glitz of what we imagine rock stars experience in that we witness the job of required social interaction with journalists, contest winners, radio station employees, and Atlantic Records reps in an endless parade of introductions and small talk. I am also amused that in those sequences the two people you don't see are Chris and Trevor. In fact you don't see a lot of Chris in general, which I assume is purposeful. Although you do get two distinct examples of his drier than a gin martini humor - Chris Squire was the master of a well-timed quip.
The most obvious example of commentary I can think of is the "Meanwhile..." intercut, illustrating that the performative aspect of rock n'roll touring only works as well as it does because it's actually powered not by its' stars, but by the people who take care of everything else behind it. The fact that the conversation in question is about a decision which one of those stars made (and it is something The Goon did not agree with) only underscores the distinction in terms of the power dynamics at work in this particular milieu.
And speaking of the little people: as much as the role of Casey Young has been downplayed over the years by various people (and then those claims subsequently debunked by Casey via social media) just think about how many times you see him backstage. He wasn't just a tech, he traveled with the band. He is actually identified in the end sequence. So let that perspective speak for itself, as it were. Casey had a job to do, but don't believe anyone who tries to convince us he didn't work all that hard.
And that reminds me! A recent edition of Yes Music Podcast features an interview with Casey - check it out (if you haven't already).
https://yesmusicpodcast.com/whos-that-under-the-stage-its-casey-young-and-hes-happy-to-talk-about-it-444/
Speaking of unsung heroes - the legendary road manager Richard Fernandez (the guy in the white hat) is shown several times along with his assistant Mickey Heyes, and these are the guys who really do all the work, along with the road crew, which Steven doesn't seem to be particularly interested in because we've never treated to a sequence showing load-in or out. It was kind of a cliche at that point, I suppose. But this leads me to ask...who is The Goon, exactly? He's a man who can make things happen, that's for sure. You always need a good fixer on the road, where anything can happen (and frequently does).
Naturally the greatest virtue of this short film is Trevor Rabin: sometimes bitchy, mostly goofy, wholly adorable. Who wouldn't want to just follow him around and chronicle his hijinks?
I think perhaps the most compelling aspect of Trevor's appearance is his air of Oh isn't this entirely ridiculous? coupled with the charm and charisma he has obviously possessed since birth, infusing his entire personality. The camera loves him, and so do we.
The Interviews
This is b-roll footage and it's uncertain what it's meant for but filmed concurrently in Edmonton. These segments were edited by his long-time collaborator Larry Blake (who was the sound recordist on Access All Areas). I think the whole is far more interesting for what isn't said as much as what is. But I also think they all tend to come off equally guarded and unguarded. There's as much equivocation as candor in their replies. And hairspray - lots and lots of hairspray.